With new software and AI advances, today’s tech curious creators can enjoy making online experiences with little to no code knowledge. As the digital skill gap is smaller than ever, understanding the benefits of no-code vs low-code webpage builders can mean a better final product that embodies your creative vision.
Low-code webpage builders
As the name implies, low-code webpage builders require a minimum of coding knowledge to work with. Beginner coders can usually handle the basic functionality of these interfaces. However, advanced coders may use them to save time. Generally, low-code platforms are used in web and mobile app development, machine-learning libraries, robotic process automation, and cross-department tools.
Coding can be a time intensive process, depending on the complexity of the desired result. Therefore low-code platforms often trade some of the tedious coding work for time-saving features. Drag-and-drop elements are popular among these platforms, as they allow users to visualize their programs more effectively. After dragging the building blocks of your program into the interface, the platform will automatically generate the resulting code in the background. Users are given the option to modify or add custom code as they see fit.
No-code page builders
No-code development platforms ditch manual code input entirely, in favor of visual input. While their interfaces may resemble low-code platforms, no-code webpage builders are completely dependent on their visual tools. As such, creators work with the core functionality provided by the interface. No-code platforms trade code customization for accessibility: users with no coding knowledge whatsoever can build webpages and apps on their own.
No-code shines when creating standalone apps or sites that follow a certain structure. They usually provide straightforward UIs and automation, so it’s a great pick for practical tools. Furthermore, with no need for additional code reviews, projects can be finished and shared quickly.
Low-code vs. no-code
With these two approaches to webpage development, let’s see how they compare to one another.
| Low code | No code | |
| Target Audience | Built for developers and technical users | Built for non-technical users with no coding knowledge |
| Type of apps | Supports the creation of complex apps and interactions | Supports the creation of simple apps and interactions |
| Time spent | Generally faster than full code as some components are templatized or pre-existing | Generally faster than low-code if templatized components are sufficient |
| Customization | Users can further customize the output with their own code | Users are constrained by the interface, often reliant on templates |
| Errors and testing | Users’ code might be prone to errors, so in-depth testing is required | Errors are rare, as any bugs would come from the interface itself. As such, the testing process is much faster. |
| Security | Security standards can be expanded upon by the developer. This becomes a necessity when adding in complex code. | Security standards will be those of the platform used. |
Go no-code or low-code with Hatch
Whether you prefer an out-of-the-box solution or want to tinker with code, Hatch lets you create and share interactive experiences unlike anywhere else online. Start from one of our templates or a blank page. Drag and drop interactive effects or build your own! Open the elements tab from the left sidebar and grab the HTML component (shown below).
This component allows you to bring your own HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to the party. The HTML component is responsible for its own rendering space, and you can use all your favorite JS libraries or frameworks to do it! Additionally, you can interact with your custom properties, and receive and send events to interact with other components.
We can’t wait to see what you create!